
I came across this post by Jonathan Waite the other day and thought I'd add it to my blog. It makes a lot of sense, and is easy to read. Here it is, and here's the link tho their blog:
http://adailyscoop.blogspot.com/By Jonathan Waite
OK, I have had plenty of family and a few friends call to talk, ask questions and discuss this current financial mess we find ourselves in. I thought I’d add my 2 cents and provide a quick overview to the financial novice.
How did we find ourselves in this mess??
I think most people know the answer to this one. Just like the stock market in the late 90s, the extreme price appreciation of real estate over the last 5-10 years has been stratospheric. It didn’t take an economist to sense a bubble. What blew this bubble up WAY big was the reckless way mortgages were doled out so freely. Speculation was rampant; loans were taken out without verification of income or assets. You could just say – “Sure I make $1 million a year and can afford this $5 million home”. I think we have all heard egregious stories of people getting in WAY over their heads in mortgage debt either looking for a quick buck or living beyond their means.
Now, here comes the tricky part, which explains some of the problems we are seeing today. Historically, you took out a loan with a bank and the bank might hold/own that loan until the end. A process called securitization really started to take off on Wall Street over the past l0-20 years. You can read the nitty, gritty on securitization
here. First off, before we explain what securitization means, remember that a mortgage loan is DEBT for you the homeowner but an ASSET for the bank or whoever owns the mortgage.
For simplicity’s sake, here’s how securitization works: a bank takes 10 loans and pools them together. These can then be split up into groups (or tranches in Wall Street parlance) based on the credit worthiness of the homeowner. Good credit loans are prime, inbetween are Alt-A and the poor credit loans are subprime. The prime group would pay a lower interest rate but be theoretically safer, while subprime would pay a higher interest rate but be riskier. OK, got that? Now, Wall Street would take this pool of ten loans, buy it from the bank (usually at a discount to make money) and then sell the tranches to investors (banks, mutual funds, insurance companies, hedge funds, individuals, etc.). It was a way for banks to make money from originating the loan and then take the risk off their balance sheet by transferring it to others. Investors were able to earn a sometimes higher rate of return with perceived lower risk because real estate never goes down right?? I guess you can see where this is heading. The subprime is the first to start cracking and we see the bankruptcy of New Century and other problems with subprime loan originators. The problems, however, then spread to ALL loans (including the prime loans) as real estate really dropped over the last 2 years. But wait, isn’t the prime tranche supposed to be safe??? As it turns out, they all went in the trash can. There were literally NO buyers (does that sound vaguely familier to people trying to sale their home right now??) Unfortunately, many investors who thought they had a more conservative investment found out otherwise. So how does that affect these big companies I keep reading about in the newspaper?
Now, it’s important to see how these big financial companies work. There were incentives in place to own/be involved in this market. First off, investment banks made big fees on putting these deals together. In addition, by investing directly in the mortgages they could earn a high yield. While I talked about banks originating these loans, then handing them off to be securitized, many banks still own a lot of loans. For the homeowner crowd out there, you might notice perhaps within the first year of your loan that there’s a new “servicer” to your loan. You probably just thought – OK, I just make the check out to a different bank. That might be where the securitization of YOUR loan took place. However, the bank still owned your loan for that first, let’s call it year. So they still have plenty of mortgages on their books. At this point, it’s also important to note that banks and investment banks make money from leverage – yes that’s right good old fashioned debt. So while they are doling out debt themselves, they take on more debt to make debt. For example, Bank A might have $100 in capital and then borrow $500 more, costing 3% and then loan out $500 at 6%. In that case, they have 5 to 1 leverage. Investment banks, on the other hand, are less regulated and in many cases use leverage of up to 30 to one. Yes, you read that right. As a point of reference commercial banks leverage ratios are about HALF of investment banks’. Just think if one of you took a $3 million loan out against your $100,000 home to fund your new start up – you would be taken out back and shot for being so reckless. But hey, that’s how the business has been run.That brings us to Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, AIG and others. They were caught holding the bad paper. The bad mortgage investments. Not only that, they were using leverage to buy those investments. So as we think of bankruptcy as one’s liabilities greater than assets, and as those assets are trading at 80 cents on the dollar, then 70, then 50, then 30… Well you get the picture.
What’s up with this bailout?? Should I be angry at this??
Well, we are on the line: who holds the ugly, unwanted mortgage investments now?? You and me, if the proposed $700 billion bailout goes through. We already own AIG, Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac. I personally believe the preceding three were too big to let fail. However, Bear Stearns and some banks that will get a reprieve by this bailout should have been allowed to fail. Don’t get me wrong – I don’t like seeing people lose their jobs. But we risk
moral hazard by constantly bailing out companies. That being said, what is the alternative?? The mortgage industry is grinding to a halt and lending was not getting done. The more you learn about global economies, the more you appreciate debt and its power. While it cuts both ways (as we’ve discussed already), it is how highways, schools and hospitals get built. It’s how business and economies work. All you have to do is travel to any third world country that has an underdeveloped credit system and you see how important lending money is to building up a society. Now, IMO the democrats in congress will likely push for the relief to go the way of taxpayers to prevent foreclosures. Legitimate argument, I’d think. It’s important to note that both proposals are going to battle the same problem – the stagnant mortgage industry. It’s just that Treasury Secretary Paulson wants to help the demand side (more loans, means more buyers), while democrats might want to help out the supply side (financially healthy homeowners means less supply of homes for sale). I really don’t know which one would be better – I haven’t seen the details yet. So bottom line, we should be disappointed. But any outcome will be disappointing. There is no happy ending to this mess.
I personally believe, we should let the market play out with these businesses (kind of like the Savings & Loan Crisis of the 1980s), let the risky businesses fail and then bailout the mortgage industry and homeowners. So what does this mean going forward, are we going into the great depression???As much as the media would like to play the role of chicken little, I don’t believe the sky is falling. We are in for some hurt as an economy though. While the data I look at doesn’t point to a technical recession currently, EVERY piece of data I look at that has to do with U.S. consumers DOES point to a recession. Manufacturing, exports, etc. are doing just fine. However, the U.S. consumer makes up 2/3rds of the economy. And it’s the American citizen that can’t seem to make enough money to catch up with inflation. And the job situation is moving in the wrong direction. NOW, in order to make McNuggets out of chicken little, this bailout could help out in restarting the moribund credit markets, leading to more debt to businesses, to more money in the system, to more jobs, etc.etc. So there are glimmers of hope. However, when a large chunk of the assets that make up an economy are a house of cards, it makes trudging through the rebuilding process a longer process.
Sorry this is so long. It’s hard to condense the technical information without leaving out important details to tell the whole story. I did leave out a lot of information but I think this is enough to get a full picture. I am no bank expert (my expertise is more consumer companies), but I thought I’d try and help people understand what is going on out there so you don’t get caught up by the talking heads on TV. I welcome any comments.